Skip to main content

Featured

Adani Out, China In: Why Is Kenya's New JKIA Deal Sh137 Billion More Expensive?

When the government abruptly pulled the plug on the controversial JKIA deal with India's Adani Group, many Kenyans breathed a sigh of relief. The project had become a lightning rod for public anger. Questions swirled around transparency, value for money, and the wisdom of effectively handing over the country's most important airport to a foreign company for decades. Critics described it as a bad deal. Government officials appeared to agree. The message was simple: Kenya deserved better. Now, barely two years later, reports have emerged that a Chinese firm has secured a contract worth approximately Sh375 billion to upgrade Jomo Kenyatta International Airport. Pause for a moment and let that sink in. The Adani proposal that sparked a national uproar was reportedly valued at around Sh238 billion. The new deal is said to be worth roughly Sh137 billion more. Naturally, a natural question arises:  What exactly changed? The Price Tag Nobody Is Talking About The first thing that jumps ...

Finance Bill 2024: A Trojan Horse for the Economic Subjugation of Kenya



“The day you hear the whites speak of me in good terms, don’t share your secrets with me, because that means I would have betrayed you already.” ~ Samora Machel

In a move that seems more draconian than democratic, the Finance Bill 2024 has been introduced with an array of taxes that threaten to stifle Kenya’s socio-economic fabric.

The Ruto government’s latest attempt to bolster its revenue stream by implementing an eco-levy, among other morally dubious taxes, has provoked widespread ire and resistance from various quarters, including the Law Society of Kenya, industry stakeholders, and the general public.

The Financial Squeeze
The Finance Bill 2024's eco-levy is presented as a noble initiative to protect the environment, yet its true purpose appears to be a desperate scramble for funds under the guise of environmental stewardship. This tax, ostensibly for environmental protection, seems to mask the Ruto government's underlying intention to sell carbon credits to foreign entities, notably the UAE. The increasing burden of taxes on essential services and everyday activities—ranging from mobile money transactions to possibly even personal mobility—reflects a government grasping at straws to meet its financial obligations to international creditors.

Economic Implications
The consistent upward trajectory of William Ruto's tax regime is alarming. Such volatility, combined with a lack of comprehensive consultation and transparency, will lead to economic stagnation. The cumulative effect of these taxes is not just a strain on individual livelihoods but a potential deterrent for investors, who, having been advised by the Ruto regime to relocate to Uganda to avoid the unbearable tax regime it has implemented, might view the Kenyan market as increasingly unpredictable and hostile.

The Finance Bill 2024 threatens to create an untenable economic environment, exacerbating poverty and inequality while eroding public trust in governance.

A Neocolonial Agenda?
This bill raises the spectre of neocolonialism, as it appears to serve the interests of international financial institutions and the West rather than the Kenyan populace.

The IMF's endorsement of the bill underscores this concern. The IMF's statement statement below, delivered when the Kenya Association of Manufacturers engaged with the IMF Kenya Resident Representative, Selim Cakir (the final boss?), on the impacts of the Finance Bill, 2024, highlights the need for "A sizable and upfront fiscal adjustment in FY24/25 will be needed to correct the course. To this end, the authorities have taken decisive steps towards fiscal consolidation by introducing several measures in the context of the draft 2024/25 Budget and the 2024 Finance Bill," effectively dictating Kenya’s fiscal policies.

The involvement of global financial entities in drafting the bill suggests a broader agenda of economic subjugation, reminiscent of historical exploitation under colonial rule.

Resistance and Critique
The backlash against William Ruto's Finance Bill 2024 is significant. The Law Society of Kenya and other stakeholders have voiced their apprehensions, calling for a reconsideration of the bill. They argue that the bill infringes upon the principles of the rule of law and fails to incorporate meaningful public participation. This resistance reflects a growing awareness among Kenyans of the need to protect their economic sovereignty and democratic rights.


The Real Cost of Compliance
Compliance with IMF conditions often comes at a steep price. Kenya’s recent history of struggling to meet revenue collection targets has now culminated in this punitive bill.


The Finance Bill 2024 represents more than just a fiscal policy; it is a litmus test for Kenya’s future.


The implications of this bill are far-reaching, potentially crippling the economy and undermining the nation’s autonomy. It is imperative that Kenyans, policymakers, and civil society organisations scrutinise the motivations behind this bill and mobilise against its implementation.
The narrative of neocolonial control through economic policies must be challenged, and William Ruto must prioritise the welfare of this country's citizens over the dictates of the West.

Colonialism is back like it never left. As the debate around the Finance Bill 2024 intensifies, it becomes clear that the fight is no longer about taxes but about the very soul of this nation. Will Kenya, under William Ruto, capitulate to external pressures, or will it rise to protect its sovereignty and economic future?
The answer lies in the collective action and resilience of its people.

Comments